Wednesday, January 31, 2007

صندوق التبرع بالدين

كنت استمع أمس بالصدفة إلى إذاعة "صوت الشعب" حين اتصلت إحدى المواطنات واسمها ومريم. أعجبتني جداً أفكار مريم التي كانت تتكلم عن الطائفية والمذهبية المستشرية في نفوس اللبنانيين، وكيف أن الناس باتوا يتصارعون طائفياً وينسون وضعهم المعيشي والسياسي المتجه إلى المجهول. لكن أكثر ما أعجبني هو فكرة ً طرحتها مريم تدعو إلى إقامة صندوق وطني للتبرع بالدين. نعم أعلم أن الفكرة غريبة. إنشاء صندوق وطني اسمه صندوق التبرع بالدين وبالمذهب بما أن النزاع في لبنان ليس، حتى الآن، طائفياً بقدر ما هو مذهبي. يتم التبرع للصندوق بالدين والمذهب وذلك بهدف استبدال الانتماء الديني والمذهبي بالانتماء الوطني. أي أتبرع بديني لوطني وأصبح أنتمي فقط للبنان وليس لأي طائفة أو مذهب

والمقصود ليس أن يصبح المتبرع بدينه ملحداً فالفكرة لا علاقة لها بالإيمان. الإيمان مختلف عن الدين أو الانتماء إلى الدين. أنا أقصد أن يتخلى الإنسان عن الكلمة المذكورة في إخراج القيد وعن الفئة التي ينتمي إليها عند الولادة والتي ليس له علاقة بها. ففي لبنان نحن منذ الولادة ننتمي لفئة معينة دون أي رأي أو اختيار. الإيمان هو قرار أما الهوية الدينية فهي ميراث. لذا أعتقد أن التبرع بها من أجل الوطن ليس بأمر صعب

ومن يتبرع بدينه ومذهبه يتخلى عن انتمائه الطائفي الذي يحدد عن الولادة. أي بعد التبرع يصبح الشخص ينتمي إلى فئة أخرى هي فئة الوطنيين نقطة على السطر وليس الوطنيين المسلمين أو الوطنيين المسيحيين أوالسنة أو الشيعة أو الدروز. يصبح المتبرع: لبناني نقطة. لبناني لا يخاف على حقوق طائفته ولا يشارك في أي مواجهة بين أبناء طائفة وطائفة أخرى. المتبرع يحارب لأجل الوطن ويُعنى بمشاكل الوطن ويقلق على مستقبل الوطن فقط. وباستطاعة المتبرع أن ينتمي إلى أي تيار سياسي يريد طالما أن هذا الانتماء نابع من قرار شخصي لا علاقة له بالانتماء الطائفي وطالما أنه لا يتبع زعيم معين كونه زعيم لطائفته

فلنفتح الصندوق عبر هذا المقال. من مستعد للتبرع بدينه أو مذهبه؟

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Day of Shame!

Yesterday was a tragic day in the contemporary History of Lebanon. I'm pretty sure that yesterday's sad events reminded most of the Lebanese people who lived during the civil war of the period of terror, fear and hatred that ruled Lebanon for 20 years. Although it was a black moment in the lives of the Lebanese, the only thing that was right was the Army’s behavior.

The Lebanese troops were present everywhere yesterday. They were standing next to the burning wheels and doing their best to calm the protesters. It’s true that they couldn’t open the roads. It’s also true that they couldn’t stop all the fights and confrontations that took place between the militants of the opposition and the people who were trying to open the roads. But they were in the streets, taking no sides and trying to prove that they were the only neutral institution in Lebanon.

I salute our honoroble army.

What was realy revolting yesterday, other then blocking the streets and forbiding people to get to their work, is that most of the supporters of the majority and a number of ministers and deputies criticized the army saying that it was doing nothing and that it was standing with the opposition. In fact I think that this reaction was wrong, miscalculated and dangerous. I beleive that the most important thing in the coming period is to support and protect our troops. This is the only way to protect our country from falling appart. The army is our last bastion in front ot the civil war.

I read today Robert Fisk’s article about yesterday’s incidents and I was amazed by the last paragraph:

“The mobs were there in their thousands, chorusing their hatred for those who lived across the other side of the boulevard. There were few officers. But after an hour, a Lebanese colonel ran down the street, a smartly dressed man, not even wearing a flak jacket, who walked straight into the highway between these two great waves of angry people, the stones banging off his helmet and body and legs. And the soldiers around me stood up and ran into the road to join him between these two enormous forces.

I don't like journalists who fall in love with armies. I don't like armies. But yesterday it seemed that this one man was a lonely symbol of what stood between Lebanon and chaos. I don't know his religion. His soldiers were Sunnis and Shias and Christians ­ I had checked, of course ­ all dressed in the same uniform. Could they hold together, could they remain under his command when their brothers and cousins, some of them, must have been among the crowds? They did. Some even grinned as they hurled themselves at the hooded men and youths too young to have known the last civil war, pleading and shouting for the violence to end. They won. This time. But what about today?”

Thursday, October 19, 2006

Un article qui exprime mes sentiments vis a vis de la situation politique au Liban

Feuille de route - Lettre ouverte à nos zaïms
Nous étouffons, lâchez prise
L'article de Michel HAJJI GEORGIOU

À l’attention des différents chefs politiques libanais,Messieurs,Se lancer dans la rédaction d’une lettre ouverte qui vous est adressée n’est pas chose aisée. Ma dernière expérience en la matière, qui remonte au moment où un certain nombre de Libanais – d’autres, bien plus radicaux, n’ont pas été dupes un instant – vivaient dans l’espérance de vous voir transformer la conférence de dialogue en porte de salut pour le pays, était, sur ce point, concluante. Certains amis m’avaient bien gentiment fait comprendre, à l’époque, qu’il était parfaitement inutile de s’adresser à vous, parce que, disaient-ils, vous n’écoutez pas, et n’avez en ligne de mire que vos propres intérêts, personnels, communautaires, et qui arrivent parfois à coïncider, par erreur, avec ceux de la nation. J’ai écouté sans broncher. Il est en effet nécessaire d’épuiser les recours avant de décider s’il faut tirer un trait nihiliste sur quelque chose ou sur quelqu’un.Qu’à cela ne tienne, il ne faut pas se laisser aller au défaitisme, d’autant que la sinistrose est déjà suffisamment bien distillée dans notre vie de tous les jours. Au contraire, l’espoir doit nous porter continuellement, pour reprendre le titre d’un ouvrage de combat sur l’énergie de vivre et de survivre, écrit par un Libanais, jeune de surcroît, et paru dans le courant de l’année écoulée.Mais beaucoup de Libanais, et il est question ici de simples citoyens, qui n’ont pas le luxe de s’enfermer comme vous dans des tours d’ivoire, doivent sans cesse se convaincre, chaque matin au réveil, qu’il ne faut pas se laisser abattre par tout ce fiel injecté au jour le jour dans le discours et la pratique politiques. Qu’il ne faut pas se laisser démonter par cette omniprésence des intérêts privés dans les affaires publiques, ou encore de la démagogie ambiante et de l’absence d’esprit démocratique qui semblent inlassablement voués à présider aux destinées de cette société, sans aucun souci, ou si peu, du dilemme auquel de plus en plus d’individus sont confrontés chaque jour : partir, ne pas partir. Avec une question poignante en filigrane, puisqu’elle résume tout le malheur de générations successives entières : « Mais qu’est-ce qui me retient encore dans ce pays ? »Si l’an dernier, messieurs, malgré l’horreur des attentats et la peur de l’inconnu, beaucoup évitaient de se poser la question, ou tout au moins d’y apporter une réponse, la situation a changé. Il y a, désormais, dans le désordre : le poids de la politicaillerie, le bruit sordide des engrenages communautaires, le choc des insultes que vous vous projetez mutuellement en toute irresponsabilité, ainsi que cette bien fâcheuse manie de considérer que les femmes et les hommes qui vous ont accordé leur confiance pour que vous les meniez à bon port comme de simples chiffres, de vulgaires acquis, et, surtout, ce fait de prendre des décisions unilatérales en pensant que vous possédez un pouvoir de vie ou de mort sur vos sujets ; bref, tout cela a contribué à modifier la donne. Bon nombre de ces individus sont dégoûtés, écœurés. Ils ne font plus de grands écarts pour éviter de se poser la question létale : ils s’efforcent d’y apporter une seule réponse, presque toujours la même. « N’importe où, mais ailleurs. »Messieurs,Depuis l’océan de vie du Printemps de Beyrouth, la sinistrose a contaminé l’ensemble du pays, et vous y avez grandement contribué, à travers vos interminables querelles politiques et votre incapacité, jusqu’à présent, à donner corps, ne serait-ce qu’un tantinet, à l’État – exception faite, et l’hommage est de circonstance, à Fouad Siniora. Cet État, apparemment voué à rester cette merveilleuse chimère dont on use, non sans cynisme, pour consoler les amoureux transis, ceux qui ont perdu toute illusion mais qu’il faut cependant maintenir en vie, dans l’espoir qu’il y ait, justement, de l’espoir. Non que vous ayez hérité d’une situation prodigieuse, d’une conjoncture mirifique : on ne vous demande pas l’impossible, d’ailleurs, personne ne vous a rien demandé, dans l’absolu. Vous aspirez toutefois à jouer les premiers rôles, cela vous impose donc, de facto, certaines responsabilités, certains devoirs.Les jeunes veulent s’en aller. À défaut d’entrer dans une certaine forme d’exil psychologique ou encore de résistance désespérée sans aucune chance de réussite. Ils veulent partir, et c’est compréhensible. Ils en ont ras le bol, de cette culture de mort qui les étouffe, qui les assaille, sans cesse. Déjà qu’elle ravage Gaza et Bagdad, elle n’a pas besoin de porte-voix au Liban. Oui, messieurs, parfois les mots suffisent à tuer.La société aspire à autre chose. Elle aspire à respirer. Les étudiants doivent avoir autre chose à faire que de s’entretuer sur leur campus au nom de vos slogans stériles. Ils sont, en puissance, la plus belle dynamique de réforme que ce pays a connue. Il suffit pour cela que vous acceptiez de les libérer, de rompre le cordon ombilical, de leur permettre de faire usage de leur créativité. Les artistes sont déprimés. Tout, dans le pays, les renvoie aux ténèbres de l’avenir, alors qu’ils peuvent transformer ce pays en un immense et perpétuel festival de vie, qu’ils ont cette pierre philosophale capable de refaire du Liban le pôle de rayonnement culturel dans la région. La société civile aspire à une culture de vie, de joie, de lumière, loin de vos marécages, loin de cette censure morale que vous exercez naturellement sur ses moindres mouvements, à travers vos actes et vos déclarations incendiaires. La société civile peut rebâtir ce pays, elle a toute l’énergie de vie, toute la volonté pour le faire. Et ce ne sont pas les femmes et les hommes qui manquent pour le faire.Messieurs,Vous nous étouffez.Ne partez pas. Le pays est à vous autant qu’il est à tous les Libanais. Mais tenez-vous un instant à l’écart, lâchez un peu les brides.Laissez le Liban respirer. Il n’en sera que plus beau et plus fort, à l’image de ses habitants. Un véritable espace de vie.Michel HAJJI GEORGIOU

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

Look who's fighting terrorism????

I read today this very interesting article in The New York Times:
"Can You Tell a Sunni From a Shiite?
By JEFF STEIN, The New York Times

FOR the past several months, I’ve been wrapping up lengthy interviews with Washington counterterrorism officials with a fundamental question: “Do you know the difference between a Sunni and a Shiite?”

A “gotcha” question? Perhaps. But if knowing your enemy is the most basic rule of war, I don’t think it’s out of bounds. And as I quickly explain to my subjects, I’m not looking for theological explanations, just the basics: Who’s on what side today, and what does each want?

After all, wouldn’t British counterterrorism officials responsible for Northern Ireland know the difference between Catholics and Protestants? In a remotely similar but far more lethal vein, the 1,400-year Sunni-Shiite rivalry is playing out in the streets of Baghdad, raising the specter of a breakup of Iraq into antagonistic states, one backed by Shiite Iran and the other by Saudi Arabia and other Sunni states.

A complete collapse in Iraq could provide a haven for Al Qaeda operatives within striking distance of Israel, even Europe. And the nature of the threat from Iran, a potential nuclear power with protégés in the Gulf states, northern Saudi Arabia, Lebanon and the Palestinian territories, is entirely different from that of Al Qaeda. It seems silly to have to argue that officials responsible for counterterrorism should be able to recognize opportunities for pitting these rivals against each other.

But so far, most American officials I’ve interviewed don’t have a clue. That includes not just intelligence and law enforcement officials, but also members of Congress who have important roles overseeing our spy agencies. How can they do their jobs without knowing the basics?

My curiosity about our policymakers’ grasp of Islam’s two major branches was piqued in 2005, when Jon Stewart and other TV comedians made hash out of depositions, taken in a whistleblower case, in which top F.B.I. officials drew blanks when asked basic questions about Islam. One of the bemused officials was Gary Bald, then the bureau’s counterterrorism chief. Such expertise, Mr. Bald maintained, wasn’t as important as being a good manager.

A few months later, I asked the F.B.I.’s spokesman, John Miller, about Mr. Bald’s comments. “A leader needs to drive the organization forward,” Mr. Miller told me. “If he is the executive in a counterterrorism operation in the post-9/11 world, he does not need to memorize the collected statements of Osama bin Laden, or be able to read Urdu to be effective. ... Playing ‘Islamic Trivial Pursuit’ was a cheap shot for the lawyers and a cheaper shot for the journalist. It’s just a gimmick.”

Of course, I hadn’t asked about reading Urdu or Mr. bin Laden’s writings.

A few weeks ago, I took the F.B.I.’s temperature again. At the end of a long interview, I asked Willie Hulon, chief of the bureau’s new national security branch, whether he thought that it was important for a man in his position to know the difference between Sunnis and Shiites. “Yes, sure, it’s right to know the difference,” he said. “It’s important to know who your targets are.”

That was a big advance over 2005. So next I asked him if he could tell me the difference. He was flummoxed. “The basics goes back to their beliefs and who they were following,” he said. “And the conflicts between the Sunnis and the Shia and the difference between who they were following.”

O.K., I asked, trying to help, what about today? Which one is Iran — Sunni or Shiite? He thought for a second. “Iran and Hezbollah,” I prompted. “Which are they?”

He took a stab: “Sunni.”

Wrong.

Al Qaeda? “Sunni.”

Right.

AND to his credit, Mr. Hulon, a distinguished agent who is up nights worrying about Al Qaeda while we safely sleep, did at least know that the vicious struggle between Islam’s Abel and Cain was driving Iraq into civil war. But then we pay him to know things like that, the same as some members of Congress.

Take Representative Terry Everett, a seven-term Alabama Republican who is vice chairman of the House intelligence subcommittee on technical and tactical intelligence.

“Do you know the difference between a Sunni and a Shiite?” I asked him a few weeks ago.

Mr. Everett responded with a low chuckle. He thought for a moment: “One’s in one location, another’s in another location. No, to be honest with you, I don’t know. I thought it was differences in their religion, different families or something.”

To his credit, he asked me to explain the differences. I told him briefly about the schism that developed after the death of the Prophet Muhammad, and how Iraq and Iran are majority Shiite nations while the rest of the Muslim world is mostly Sunni. “Now that you’ve explained it to me,” he replied, “what occurs to me is that it makes what we’re doing over there extremely difficult, not only in Iraq but that whole area.”

Representative Jo Ann Davis, a Virginia Republican who heads a House intelligence subcommittee charged with overseeing the C.I.A.’s performance in recruiting Islamic spies and analyzing information, was similarly dumbfounded when I asked her if she knew the difference between Sunnis and Shiites.

“Do I?” she asked me. A look of concentration came over her face. “You know, I should.” She took a stab at it: “It’s a difference in their fundamental religious beliefs. The Sunni are more radical than the Shia. Or vice versa. But I think it’s the Sunnis who’re more radical than the Shia.”

Did she know which branch Al Qaeda’s leaders follow?

“Al Qaeda is the one that’s most radical, so I think they’re Sunni,” she replied. “I may be wrong, but I think that’s right.”

Did she think that it was important, I asked, for members of Congress charged with oversight of the intelligence agencies, to know the answer to such questions, so they can cut through officials’ puffery when they came up to the Hill?

“Oh, I think it’s very important,” said Ms. Davis, “because Al Qaeda’s whole reason for being is based on their beliefs. And you’ve got to understand, and to know your enemy.”

It’s not all so grimly humorous. Some agency officials and members of Congress have easily handled my “gotcha” question. But as I keep asking it around Capitol Hill and the agencies, I get more and more blank stares. Too many officials in charge of the war on terrorism just don’t care to learn much, if anything, about the enemy we’re fighting. And that’s enough to keep anybody up at night."

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

Turkey cancels USD 500 million deal with aircraft industry

"Turkey scraps deal with Israel Aircraft Industries to upgrade aircraft in protest at Lebanon offensive
Aryeh Egozy, Ynet News

The war deals a severe blow to Israel Aircraft Industries: The Turkish government has canceled a deal to upgrade fighter jets worth USD 500 million because of the war in Lebanon.

The Israel Aircraft Industries fears that more deals could be canceled.

In 1997 Turkey signed an agreement with Israel for the upgrading of 54 Phantom aircraft at the cost of USD 1 billion.

The deal was concluded in 2003 and Turkey showed interest in upgrading another 50 Phantom jets for USD 500 million.

Turkey is weighing the purchase of new F-16 jets from the United States instead of upgrading its old fleet.

"They are old costumers, and the cancellation of the deal is a very bad sign," a senior military official said Monday.

The Israel Aircraft Industries refused to comment on the decision.

Turkey's interest in Israeli military products has long been considered as a "goldmine" in Israel.

"Turkey was conceived as a replacement for South Africa and Iran, who were big customers of Israeli weapons," he said.

Since the war in Lebanon opposition parties in Turkey have increased pressure on the government to cut military ties with Israel. "

Now that's intresting news!!!
Go Turkey go!!

Tuesday, July 04, 2006

Help us get rid of the Islamists!

“A former U.S. Army soldier was charged yesterday with the rape and murder of a young Iraqi woman and the slayings of three of her family members in their home south of Baghdad in March, federal prosecutors said.” The Washington Post.

Don’t they know that it’s this kind of behavior that strengthen the Islamists. That's what helps them find alibis to carry on their terrorist acts. That's what convince young Muslims to join the Islamists in order to protect their families from these atrocities. The Americans forces in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East should be very careful in their behavior to prevent the expansion of the Islamic movements. But if they continue to neglect the specifics of the people of this region the Islamists will keep on flourishing. Anyway it’s a good thing that at least this soldier was held accountable of what he has done.

Friday, May 19, 2006

Love

What love got to do with:

Parents, apartments, religion, regions, money, cars, furniture, friends, brothers and sisters, brothers and sisters in law, diplomas, weddings, dresses, parties, chocolate, candy, dinners, lunches, relatives, sheikhs, priests, politics, wars, neighbors, traditions, ethics, souvenirs, jewelry, flowers…..

Love is that look in your eyes, it’s your unforgettable smile, it’s a sweet melody in my head, and an infinite river of joy in my heart.

Love is how my hand always reaches your hand and how I hear your words before you say them. Love is when I forget all my troubles when I’m between your tender arms, and when time stops when we are alone together.

Lov, it's just You and Me.